“Predictive Coding” is a trend worth noting.
Posted By Cliff Tuttle | June 11, 2012
No. 849
Electronic discovery is so expensive that it has heretofore been confined to cases involving high stakes. However, a variety of technologies have emerged that sometimes enable searchers to cull out a vast number of documents. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported on a Virginia federal case in which the court authorized the use of Predictive Coding over the objections of the opposing party. Local e-discovery pioneer Karl Schinneman is the expert witness in this case.
Of course, as a useful technology becomes cheaper, its use becomes more widespread. It is not yet clear whether electronic discovery will become the norm in lower dollar cases. Pointing in that direction is the common observation that many small businesses do the overwhelming portion of their communication with customers, suppliers and others by email. In a small case, the dilemma is twofold. A smaller sample of documents is involved which must be pulled efficiently from an ever-growing population. But the only way to be sure that a document is responsive to the discovery request is to read it.
There is another dimension to electronic documents. They can be studied for their metadata. That means that edits in prior drafts may reveal something that the author didn’t want to communicate. Or it may reveal information about other matters. This is why there is ethical concern over lawyers providing documents written in Word or other searchable media formats. Lawyers often use old documents as templates, enabling a recipient to read confidential information.
CLT