Cybercourts for Smart Contracts?
Posted By Cliff Tuttle | June 14, 2018
No. 1,504
According to Wikipedia:
“A smart contract is a computer protocol intended to digitally facilitate, verify, or enforce the negotiation or performance of a contract. Smart contracts allow the performance of credible transactions without third parties. These transactions are trackable and irreversible.[1] Smart contracts were first proposed by Nick Szabo, who coined the term, in 1994.[2]
Proponents of smart contracts claim that many kinds of contractual clauses may be made partially or fully self-executing, self-enforcing, or both. The aim of smart contracts is to provide security that is superior to traditional contract law and to reduce other transaction costs associated with contracting. Various cryptocurrencies have implemented types of smart contracts.”
Economist Alex Taberrok wrote today in his blog, Marginal Revolution about the idea that a computer could become the mediator of disputes involving smart contracts. Presumably, instead of consulting case law, the cyber court would apply appropriate algorithms to the facts of a dispute. Its not too far in the future, actually. The disputed subject matter would involve a limited number of variables. The algorithms would be generated from the rules of the smart contract together with other agreed answers. You would put it together like the Uniform Commercial Code. And, of course, if there is a consensus that a verdict is wrong, you can reprogram it for the next time.
CLT